Gasoline and Unemployment in Southern California

The recent release of State and Metro unemployment data from BLS comes at a time when oil prices have just made a new, 52 week high, and it seems appropriate to consider the these developments together. As I have noted previously on this blog, Southern California is a kind of super-region in terms of population and our collective vehicle fleet to both the State of California itself, and to the United States as as whole. Indeed, there is no more perfect region in the country to watch the effects of the housing crash, unemployment, changes in interest rates, and the price of oil.

First, let’s consider that gasoline prices in Southern California are once again solidly above $3.00 per gallon. This is higher than petrol prices one year ago in either November, or December of 2008–or even January of 2009. But of course the advance since that time in unemployment in Southern California has been dramatic.  In LA-Long Beach-Santa Ana, unemployment has soared from 8.2% to 11.5% from November 2008 to November 2009. In Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, from 9.7% to 14.2%. And in San Diego-Carslbad-San Marcos from 6.9 to 10.3%. While the $4.00 and $5.00 dollar gasoline of late Winter and Spring 2008 was painful, and was falling over a quickly deteriorating situation in California’s economy, this recent gasoline move to post-financial crisis highs is falling over extremely high unemployment in California as a whole. Indeed, the broader measure of unemployment in the metro areas mentioned above would be even higher, as California’s U-6 measure is at least as high as 19.6%. | see: Alternative Measures of Labor Underutilization for States, Fourth Quarter of 2008 through Third Quarter of 2009 Averages.

When the BLS releases its next update to this quarterly report later this month, I expect that U-6 for California will finally crack 20%. Let’s also consider that the 5 Big Counties of Southern California, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, and San Diego, not only contain 60% of California’s total population, but also are the counties where people are very leveraged to the automobile. You can begin to imagine the buzz-saw that will begin to cut across SoCal’s woeful situation should oil rise to $90 and possible $100 as we proceed into Spring.

Gasoline at $3.15 and headed to $3.50 in January of 2010 is at least as destructive if not moreso than the 4-5 dollar gasoline of late Spring 2008 and certainly than the comparable prices of one year ago. More importantly I strongly disagree that these changes in petrol prices have little more than moderately damaging effect on the US economy. And here’s why: if 1 out of 7 people in the country is currently taking food stamps (12 January 2009 correction1 out of 8 people) , with the additional data point that 1 out of 4 children in the country are currently benefiting from food stamps, then clearly petrol prices matter. Alot. If a household needs public assistance to put food in the mouths of children, then that household’s monthly gasoline expense rising to say $160 from $120 will not go unnoticed. Recent data has shown that the growth in food stamp demand in California has been quickly accelerating. I think it’s not too strong a conclusion, therefore, to speculate that petrol prices are once again at-the-ready to crush any nascent economic recovery in the United States.

-Gregor

Painting: Road Show, by Hubert Blanz

  • Pete_Murphy
    Unemployment, both in the U.S. and the world as a whole, marches ever higher because the field of economics doesn't account for the relationship between population density and per capita consumption.

    Following the beating the field of economics took over the seeming failure of Malthus' theory, economists adamantly refuse to ever again consider the effects of population growth. If they did, they might come to understand that once an optimum population density is breached, further over-crowding begins to erode per capita consumption and, consequently, per capita employment.

    And these effects of an excessive population density are actually imported when a nation like the U.S. attempts to trade freely with other nations much more densely populated - nations like China, Japan, Germany, Korea and a host of others. The result is an automatic trade deficit and loss of jobs - tantamount to economic suicide.

    Using 2006 data, an in-depth analysis reveals that, of our top twenty per capita trade deficits in manufactured goods (the trade deficit divided by the population of the country in question), eighteen are with nations much more densely populated than our own. Even more revealing, if the nations of the world are divided equally around the median population density, the U.S. had a trade surplus in manufactured goods of $17 billion with the half of nations below the median population density. With the half above the median, we had a $480 billion deficit!

    If you‘re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, then I invite you to visit my web site at http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com.

    Pete Murphy
    Author, "Five Short Blasts"
  • I live in San Bernardino County and drive the infamous 91 freeway. I have seen big changes on this freeway over the last two years. While the large decline in traffic has been wonderful for my road rage -- err, nerves -- it still speaks volumes about the economy. Gregor's points resonant with experiences that I have seen and heard from living in So Cal. I tried to switch to public transportation to get from San Bernardino County to Orange County (for work) and it would take a three hour commute to do so. Mainly because of the lack of trains/buses/etc that would be required to run these routes efficiently.
  • gregor.us
    My best take so far is that alot of Southern California really starts to become dysfunctional once you approach 10 dollars per gallon. At that level, the petrol costs for city and state services really begins to get completely out of hand. As you well know, the size of a county, a state highway in SoCal is so much bigger than in other parts of the country.

    Welcome to energy transition. The best case is not very good at all from this point forward and the worst case is grim.
  • cougar_w
    "Dysfunctional" at $10/gal? Wow, an optimist! I would say "societal meltdown" at $10 and peg dysfunctional at $6.

    People are daily driving 40 miles in traffic to jobs that pay $6 an hour. They'll give it up once it takes 3 hours of work just to pay for their daily commute. When enough of them give up is when the wheels really fall off.
  • Any thoughts on this news, given the thesis? Golden State Off the Rails as Mass Transit Ridership Plummets.

    _________
  • gregor.us
    Overall, I see it as one more example of collapse. These large systems need a minimum operating level to achieve efficiency. As budgets get cut and ridership drops in part because people are not going to work, the transport authorities raise fares in a self-defeating spiral. As a marginal point, REASON is consistently wrong and has been for years in asserting that the way to measure the efficacy of a public transport system is whether it pays for itself by fare revenue. Again, that is an ideological quirk of the REASON folks that is subordinate to the larger point. And that is, it appears we are ratcheting up here with both higher fares on transport and higher petrol prices again. Ouch. Devastating stuff for CA.
  • cougar_w
    In my neck-o-da-woods (CA Bay Area) people are dropping off commuter rail because it is too expensive (significant fee increases) and becoming unreliable (more suicides/accidents). The fee increases came because of increased fuel costs last year, and then because of ... reduced riders (seriously). Unemployment is hight here and increasing and people that do have jobs are sometimes looking way out of town to find them, where rail and bus service is expensive, time-consuming and incomplete, so they are forced to drive where before they had options.

    I sense that the commuter rail and bus system here is doomed, just as the workforce is becoming fragmented and desperate. Give it another year, two tops, before they start to fold up.

    FWIW, I now ride an electric bicycle 30 miles to work 5 days a week. Loving it. They won't get another dime of my money or a minute of my time if I have anything to say about it.

    cougar
  • gregor.us
    Yep. FWIW, we saw ridership spike in LA, Denver, and other metro areas in Spring of 2008. Of course, that is when petrol prices were quite high, and unemployment had not yet reached current levels. Now we have a perfect storm of punk employment, slashed budgets for public transport, and in the memory of the public, "lower" petrol prices which are now beginning to rise again.

    G
blog comments powered by Disqus