Revaluing Gold

In the run-up to the G20 meeting there was a ton of underground chatter that the USD might get re-pegged at a new level, to gold. While much of that talk came from the gold-bug and macro blogosphere, we’re now getting some indications the idea is broadening out, to more mainstream observers.

In his weekly call today, Don Coxe suggested President Obama may want to revalue gold to 1000.00/ounce. Coxe’s view is that a number of problems would be solved at once by such a move. First, it would be an anti-deflationary tactic. The revaluation would make explicit what has already become tacit: that the gold in Ft Knox is worth alot more than 40.00/ounce. Second, by agreeing to both buy gold and sell gold at that price, the US government would be allaying fears that the USD was going to collapse, while at the same time acknowledging that decades of dollar devaluation had already taken place. In Coxe’s view, gold revaluation would demonstrate to the world that there was indeed backing to our currency, and, it could facilitate Treasury’s need to conduct more borrowings.

http://gthorp.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/fort-knox.jpg

I share Coxe’s view that a gold revaluation would not solve all the problems of the US. However, I have held the view for some year’s now that once the US got into a nasty situation where its debt was put into play, that assets under the control of the US, from timber to oil to base metals, would have to be called upon and listed in a more formal way to creditors. The revaluation of the gold in Fort Knox would therefore be a way for the US to pledge the asset. It might also be a way to bring some discipline to future government spending. Given the current alternatives, issuing endless quantities of Treasuries and maintaining this impending sense that the USD is set for another huge downward move, gold revaluation starts to look like a decent solution at a difficult time. The lingering questio would only be: is there actually enough gold in Ft Knox to revalue at the 1000.00/ounce level?

-Gregor

  • OBSERVER
    President Obama said change is coming and this is a perfect idea for change. To back the Dollar with gold is a powerful statement that only Obama can make. We are grateful as a nation to have Obama with his leadership and unique qalifications.
  • gregory
    To solve the nations debt problem all treaury debt could be monetized by gold. At $10+ trillion and assuming there is one billion ounces in public and private hands in the USA, each ounce would command $10,000 . Deflation would still occure due to non-treasury debt defaulting. At the same time the Federal Reserve would disapear and The treasury of the people can get back control of the nations money system from this private banking group.
  • Greg,

    Agreed. Gold standard, if pegged at very high price (e.g. US$10,000 per ounce?), would brings the best ever combo deal - (i) bring a “highly-effective one-off inflation” while (ii) freeze any after-effect and suspicion of future inflation (by pegging the gold price high enough, the public will not speculate re-pegging).

    FYI:
    http://vicktorcapitalist.com/blog/2009/01/21/pe...
  • Bob Dobb
    Whenever a bank gets in a jam they call the fed and say "hey, we screwed up, bail us out". Well, these are mostly CONFIDENCE issues. So, the fed rolls a truck up with 10 million ounces of gold under bullet proof glass and puts it in the lobby with a sign marked "This gold is property of this bank". Then, when everybody calms down, they drive the truck off to the next screwed up bank. I'm not kidding. This would work.
  • awesome. thx
  • I'm confused. How would this work in a world where the government can't borrow the money it needs? Everything I read indicates we'll soon start printing money to cover $1T+ deficits because we'll run out of people to loan us the cash. How can we do this if we peg the dollar to gold?
  • How much gold is in there anyhow? Is there a national security reason for owning it anymore?
  • ShortBusTrader
    Apparently they have not done an audit on the gold in decades. And every reporter or politician who has ever asked for one has been refused the audit figures. So it could be that they have loaned it all out. Lease rates for gold are now between 2-3%. So it makes sense that they would loan it all out at those rates.

    Imagine if they allowed a reporter into Fort Knox, to find that it was empty and loaned all out? or even most of it sold already.
  • IRON100
    I'm not a conspiracy nut, but think of it this way. Where is your money? Is it a number on a computer? (It is for most people). I think that it is wise to at least have cash and some kind of alternative exchange medium as a back up, if, God forbid, the banks ever did fail. In 1933, it was a problem. Not that it might happen again, but with cyberwars already being threatened by the Chinese, you never know. Keeping some medium of exchange like gold in some quantity is not such a bad idea.
  • Max
    Would Americans who own gold be allowed to keep their gold? It was a key feature of FDR's revaluation that gold was confiscated from Americans before the revaluation. Those people were robbed.
  • IRON100
    No need to worry Max, the Patriot Act has a provision within it in which the government has the right to confiscate gold at its own discretion. The 1930s could indeed return.
  • Jim
    Anything is possible. Many people would not turn theirs in. How can the government set the price anyway? It's a world commodity, currently at $800.00.
  • Max
    Basically, this resets the value of the dollar relative to gold.
  • Here's what the gov't can do: get as many near term t-bill loans sold at these super low levels. Then take that capital and buy gold with that money, then peg the dollar, then sell the gold and buy back the treasuries.
  • gregor.us
    Well done. Very well done.
blog comments powered by Disqus