Hat tip to the Economist Magazine for catching a key, energy data point from week’s BP Statistical Review: in 2010, the world consumed about 5 mbpd (million barrels per day) more oil than it produced. Anticipating the discrepancy between the two figures, the BP Statistical Review authors write on page 9 of their PDF: Differences between these world consumption figures and world production statistics are accounted for by stock changes, consumption of non-petroleum additives and substitute fuels, and unavoidable disparities in the definition, measurement or conversion of oil supply and demand data.
I agree with the Economist Magazine’s conclusion that most of the difference between 82.095 mbpd produced and 87.382 mbpd consumed came from stock changes. In other words: the drawing down of oil from inventories. Indeed, this was a key driver for oil’s advance last year from the high $70’s to over $90 a barrel. In the chart below, from the latest IEA Paris Oil Market Report, you can see that starting in mid-year, total OECD inventories started a new decline. Moreover, the histograms in the below chart also show the difference to the five year average, which also illustrates the global stocks drawdown. This coincided by the way with a resurgent, mid-year advance in the price of oil from a low of $69 to $92 by year end.
A data point of interest that the Economist did not mention, however, is that BP’s oil consumption data include global biofuels, while BP’s oil production data do not. Does the inclusion of biofuels in global consumption skew this figure meaningfully higher? My calculations show the following: No, it does not. Switching to BP’s preferred Mtoe energy unit (million tonnes oil equivalent), I find that total biofuels production was only 59.26 Mtoe in 2010. Compared to 4,028.10 Mtoe of oil consumed, there is at best 1.47% biofuel consumption embedded in BP’s total consumption figures for oil. Thus, the story of 2010–and it’s a very important story indeed–is intact. Unable to meaningfully increase global oil production to meet demand, the world ate through inventories. You have been warned.
Trading Note: There was some market chatter today that a concerted release of oil from OECD inventories could be considered to drop prices from current levels. But you can see the problem: if markets were already so imbalanced in 2010 that consumption outran production by 6.4%, then a discretionary release of oil from OECD stocks will only force the global futures market to price in less of a safety cushion in the event of war, or some other serious disruption to a major supplier like Russia or Saudi Arabia. Inventories are meant to manage disruption in flows. Not the inconvenience of “high prices.”
Further Research: Nota Bene that BP’s Oil category includes natural gas liquids (NGL’s). NGL’s are not oil. Not in any sense. Furthermore, NGL’s only contain 65% of the BTU of oil. In recent years, as crude oil production has oscillated below a ceiling, there has been growth in NGL supply. Aggregating NGL supply into “oil” categories is misleading to say the least. For a broader discussion of this accounting issue, see my essay at The Oil Drum: Secrecy By Complexity: Obfuscation in Energy Data, and The Primacy of Crude Oil.
Update, Saturday 11 June 2011: There has been considerable commentary and reaction to the BP data, as interpreted both here and at the Economist Magazine. In short, it is perhaps a more complex calculation to determine the components which cause the difference between Consumption and Production as reported by BP. One of the reasons that Gregor.us tries to deal almost exclusively with Crude Oil only–and not Liquids such as biofuels, NGL’s–is that the latter create enormous complexity on many levels, not least of which are the myriad energy inputs to creating Liquids. Moreover, both EIA Washington and IEA Paris will often include, and then disclude, various Liquids from various accountings of “oil.” This is why in the original post here, I pointed readers to some of these issues, and my Oil Drum post from earlier this year. The bottom line however is that BP is clearly trying to capture the difference between global crude oil production–and–the global demand for liquids. That still strikes me as a worthy effort–even if in my own work I try to work exclusively with crude oil only. In addition, there is absolutely a correlation between the price of oil and the ROC (rate of change) and the direction of changes to global inventories. Observations of OECD inventory changes starting in mid 2009 showed a directional drawdown which coincided with the movement in the price of oil. For context, US oil stocks form only a small portion of OECD stocks, and OECD stocks are of course themselves only a part of global stocks. In conclusion, while it remains difficult to quantify the entire inventory drawdown in 2010 on a global basis, I think most data available points to that phenomenon as having taken place, and, as having influenced the price of oil rather predictably.
OECD oil stocks data offer limited insight, March 2011, Financial Times, Javier Blas.
Global Deficit Between Oil Consumption and Production Remains the Norm, June 2011, Rigzone, Trey Cowan