Global Industrialism and Oil’s Price Envelope

While much of oil’s price behavior in October and November was due to financial market dislocations, the price of oil now at 45.00 dollars is pulsing out a renewed warning about the global macro outlook. As I have written previously, because of oil’s price structure and overall flat supply over the past few years, oil enters a kind of price envelope at 50.00 that sets off alarms, and, were oil to make it back into the low 30.00’s, then I would say the world will be engulfed in something much worse than a standard recession.

The important concept here is there can be no return to the geological or structural price conditions of, say, 1998. There is no wall of oil supply, as the world has voraciously eaten through a great swath of the cheap oil since that time.  The overall topography of the global oil market is radically different from ten years ago, especially with regard to non-OPEC oil supply. In 1998, for example, the world was growing strongly but did not need much supply from the Alberta tar sands. In that period, the UK and Mexico and Norway were still increasing production. As for Russia, much of her great growth in supply lay directly ahead.

Now all is changed. Much of that cheap conventional oil has peaked. (We used to think of North Sea oil as expensive. How interesting, as now in a world of tar sands and ultra-deepwater, it’s less costly by comparison). This means that at every price level starting at 90.00 and falling, oil is taken off the market. Mainly non-OPEC oil. We saw this almost immediately with Russian oil starting in late September. At 60.00, future production growth plans were shelved. At 40.00 we may see some tar sand production trimmed.

Oil at 70.00 was already good news for global consumers. But oil near 40.00 is very bad news for just about everyone. It would be much better for most people to have the global economy running slow, with petrol prices at 2.50/gallon, then to have the global economy in deep recession, with petrol prices at 1.50/gallon. We are approaching, unfortunately, the bad end of that equation right now.

-Gregor

  • ShortBusTrader
    Do you have an idea of how long it takes for the different types of oil suppliers to start up again after they have been shutdown and bankrupted. For example, I suppose it would take less time for a Venezuelan oil project to start up again than a Canadian oil sands project , and a Brazilian project a lot longer again. Obviously Brazilian supply is the costliest and difficult to find, what about the other major suppliers. Next post maybe.
  • gregor.us
    Interestingly, conventional oil projects can be harder to re-start because the flows are dependent on classical geology and pressure. An oil sands or tar sands project is more like a mining operation, so segmentation is easier as alot of work is done in the processing and upgrading.

    On the topic of Brazil, I think we have to recall that most of the drilling that Petrobras completed for their deepwater was to prove out the resource, not to pump it. Of course, that project is toast, now, at 42 bbl. When PBR got their first drilling invoice it was in the billions, and the PBR CEO said "you know, 125 dollar oil is a fair price."

    What goes off line first are stripper wells--these are the Ma n' Pa wells that dot the landscape globally and only produce 10-20 bbls a day but they are myriad and completely uneconomic as oil comes back to current levels. I think a research house in London is saying that a ton of production in the aggregate could be lost from these--sounds oddball, I know, but I think they are right.

    The main concern is as follows: OPEC controls all the cheap conventional oil. non-OPEC controls all the expensive, unconventional, hard to get oil.

    You also have to consider the psychological factor: oil going back to 80.00 in Q1 2009 is simply not going to persuade Shell or PetroCanada to out their tar sand expansion plans back on. We already saw how cautious the industry has become this decade, even as oil rose.

    OPEC tried to do the world a favor by acting when oil got to 100.00. But dislocations in all assets globally including currencies were a very powerful force.

    G
  • Peak oil is here and the government should do something to keep oil above $70 per barrel, e.g., via taxation. Without that support, exploration will cease. Check out GloomBoom.com
  • gregor.us
    Saudi Arabia and Russia would be doing the world a favor if they just moved their sale price to at least 60.00. I frankly don't know why they don't do it. The price would move in that direction almost immediately.

    G
  • Gregor, fascinating stuff. I'm very glad that I connected to you via Paul on twitter. I've become a regular reader.

    Cheers,
    Stuart
    (@stuartma)
  • As always, appreciate you sharing your expertise.
blog comments powered by Disqus