As America Frets, China Buys Stuff

While the US frets over loan modification programs and scary words like Nationalization, China buys stuff. Base metals stuff. Iron ore stuff. And some stuff called “oil.” in the past few weeks, investment and operational arms of the Chinese State have reached out across the world to pick up distressed assets. The first strike was on Rio Tinto, which, like other global resource companies, completed a large debt-funded acquisition just prior to the credit crunch. Chinalco swooped in with 20 billion, and, as they say in Australia, “No worries, mate.” Next up was another debt-burdened Australian miner, Oz Minerals. This time China Minmetals was the suitor, and they offered to buy the whole company for cash.

http://www.happyschoolsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/no-worries.jpg

But the biggest deals were yet to come. Just after rumors swirled that China Investment Corporation and China Shenhua Energy wanted to take a starter position in a third Australian miner, Fortescue Metals, China unveiled its coup de grace: a 25 billion multi-year deal with Russia. And this time it was not for iron ore, but rather, the master commodity: oil. And they’ve just followed that blockbuster up with a similar deal with Brazil’s Petrobras.

What seems to have escaped wider observation, however, is that deals such as these are a clever way for China to dehoard itself of dollars. This has been a favorite theme of mine for years, as an investor and chronicler of global energy supply. On Tuesday I wrote the following on Twitter: Russia has oil and needs dollars. China has dollars and needs oil. Kismet! Wait. Perhaps there are other observers out there. In today’s LEX column in the FT of London: “China has what Russia wants: masses of US dollars. Russia has what China wants: energy. Hence Tuesday’s oil-for-loans agreement between Moscow and Beijing.”

I’m glad to see someone else is paying attention.

The view here at Gregor.us is that the United States has been sleepwalking and navel gazing for years, while China locks up resources around the world. Especially in Africa. If the US now is willing to buy houses, or at least the loans on those houses, why not buy resources? I think the US Treasury would be better off with a future income stream from North American Oil and Gas, than on the dim hope of recapture from AIG’s portfolio of credit default swaps. Enough with the fretting. If our government is going to print money, and buy paper, perhaps we should buy some “stuff” as a hedge, alongside.

-Gregor

  • Yep! I was agreed, I'll keep in touch to your blog.
  • another little trick china did last week to reduce consumer savings, and increase local cash flow, was to decide to pay 5-10% of local government employee's salaries in vouchers, exchangeable at local stores for food and supplies ... i know it happened in hangzhou and chengdu and a few other cities, not sure about the rest of the country at the moment ..

    seems a smart idea
  • gregor.us
    We'll see that here in the States, Gregory. We're gonna see Stim Package 2.0 before the end of this year. The next Stim Package will probably overweight FDR style work programs, and we'll probably see more rail.

    G
  • The US is not the only navel gazing nation.

    Over 2 years ago Canada had a robust Oil and Gas Royalty Trust sector which the Conservative Government effectively disabled by imposing a surprise 31.5% tax. The problem is the tax didn't apply to LBO structred deals and guess who decided to buy a piece of the Canadian oil industry at a discount price?

    http://caiti-online-media.blogspot.com/search/l...

    Bad government policy will put assets in the hands of cash-rich players who can see long-term value.
  • gregor.us
    Sure. I remember it well. I was invested in Canadian Trusts on Halloween eve. I have followed that issue for years now.

    But at least the Candian banking system is sound. There is no question Canada will be in major pain during the US bust. But, provincial autonomy is a sleeper dynamic that will prove great strength for Canada.

    G
  • Bob Inget
    Like TraderMark says, we also have the farmland and a more favorable, for now, climate to go with it.
    Interesting thing, shortages are already beginning to appear.
    My five year old Jetta (44 MPG) radio amp suddenly packed it in. Knowing no one fixes radios, just tosses, I went to the net to find a replacement. All the vendors were out of stock. Maybe the other VW owners just beat me to the door or the company in China went broke for lack of new auto sales. Pain killers are also in short supply. I'm starting a campaign to mail Rush a few Oxys, each. This may be the reason for his extreme gouchyness, of late.
    God forbid he should overdose!

    Finally, someone outside of Argentina noticed a drought caused shortage of soybeans. Three hundred forty five ex-Asians eat tofu in Argentina, instead of steak.
    A hundred million Japanese rely on low cost 'bean cake'.

    Drought works in strange ways. Meat in Argentina and for export, might be cheaper this year then last. Ranchers disposed of entire herds, for lack of
    feed. Works the same way with oil. In following years, we can all guess what happens. A similar drought in Australia effects mankind's white bread.
    Because we continue to eat, to ease pain if nothing else, drought, of food or oil, is inflationary.

    WE see that most folks have not stopped eating. Fast food outlets are booming. (that happened in the last depression too. One chain, "Chock Full of Nuts" launched a raisin bread, cream-cheese sandwich @20 cents, .25 w/coffee, had people lined up to buy.) My point, if there is one. Demand for meat & grains is fairly inelastic. With drought hitting hard from California to Argentina, we can just imagine the brew ha ha, should Burger King get demoted to Burger Baron.

    Banks really don't grow food or put gasoline in the car. What if they were nationalized for a year or two?
  • gregor.us
    Soros is correct to be buying Potash. I track global fertilizer companies. Sure, NPK prices are way off the highs. They also are well above what they were.

    If people thought food concerns were valid during the inflationary boom of 2004-2008, lets see what happens during inflationary bust. Arriving now.

    G
  • gregor.us
    Lots of problems with Disqus the last few days. Test.
  • I so agree with you on this! It's exactly what I believed would happen. One day, whilst we are still asleep at the switch, China is going to be in a position to tell us to take our USTB's and stuff them.
  • gregor.us
    The stunner is that as China buys oil, base metals, coal, and precious metals, even traders here in the West rush into government bonds, and think "gold is a bubble."

    G
  • Great post. I am a Malthusian at heart so I guess our strategy will be to send our 300M into their 1.2 B in warfare to get the needed stuff in about 20 years. Should work out well.

    Well at least we have better agricultural land and I assume as much if not more fresh water. And coal. Screwed elsewhere.
  • gregor.us
    We're getting close to the inflationary part of the bust. Busts like this build up initial inventory, then the inventories get run down. Governments print money to solve the problem, which makes things worse.

    The late 1990's saw Schumpeter's deflationary boom. During inflationary bust, there's no profit motive in producing things. Oil is a good example. So supply crashes along with demand, until you find a newer equilibrium level and then we overshoot. Look at how oil is behaving. It can't maintain itself below 35 and it can't sustain above 45. When oil rises next--and that may not be for some time as we are indeed in a global industrial depression--the rise will not be gentle.

    Yes, we have the ability to significantly raise production of grains here in the States. We also have decent water supply (though the CA central valley is an ongoing concern). And we do have coal but even in coal we see the whole easy coal issue coming into play. Eastern thermal coal, rich in BTUs, is no longer easy.

    G
blog comments powered by Disqus