As The World Turns

The March issue of Gregor.us Monthly, As The World Turns, has now been published. In this report I mark the now completed process whereby the United States lost the ability to control the price of oil, via the power of its own demand.

The controlling factor now in global oil prices are the five billion people in the developing world. They use less oil per capita and derive more utility from each barrel. Which is a good thing, as the global supply of oil is now unable to make a sustained response to higher prices. Of course, in the West, we have come up with all sorts of weak explanations to explain our loss. The loss simply unfolded over the past decade, as global oil supply finally ran into geological constraints. It’s not because of speculation. It’s not because of price fixing. And it’s not because of any newfangled theory such as “Peak Demand.” From my March newsletter:

Peak Demand theory paints a child-like portrait of a large and powerful kingdom happily choosing at its own convenience to transition away from oil, to renewable energy resources. But no such smooth transition is in the offing, as we now understand. For, here in 2010 in the aftermath of a burst credit bubble, the United States and the rest of the OECD are not on the threshold of an energy crisis but remain very much in the middle of one. Front month oil, as we go to press, closed at $83.50 per barrel to finish out the first quarter, of 2010. Meanwhile, recent data on Housing, Employment, Wages, Savings, Foreclosures, Commercial Real Estate–and the European banking system–are hardly encouraging. The same class of post-war analysts who failed to predict oil’s entry into a new pricing era circa 2004 (and who are still in denial) have gone silent as expensive oil now unfolds over very weak Western economies.

The five billion people in the developing world know nothing about Peak Demand theory, or other such myths from oil-consultant hatcheries in America. The price of oil does not move to the drumbeat of US demand, and will not wait for us to prepare, or “get ready” for higher prices. Many still believe in some extra reservoir of oil supply that will come to our rescue. I look at the chart, and wonder why.

-Gregor

Graphic: Global Crude Oil Supply 2004-2010 (data through January 2009), with a still shot from Andy Warhol’s Empire used as background.

  • zeke

    I may be wrong but as I read Peak Oil information, I see several view points one of which is the one you mentioned. Much of what I read is similar to having a pleasant cup of coffee on the sinking Titannic. Pie in the sky solutions mixed with a fantasy about some miracle technology that will arrive at the last minute. All very pleasant and politically correct. The other thing I see is very little, if any, thoughts about the social impacts. My conclusion has been the reality of the impact of either increasing prices or demand outrunning supply is too frightening to face. I do see a small segment of folks who write about a very scary future but they are quickly condemned as “doomers” and ignored.

    I really see pure fantasy with regards to food production. Lots of talk about doing things locally by people who've never grown a garden, tried to make anything by hand, the lack of viable fertilizers and a massive lack of ability to think beyond the tiny box of modern life they live in.

    But then I'm a cynical old man who grew up without electricity, all food came from the garden, fertilizer was hauling loads (by horse) of manure from the barn and rarely bought anything from town. Life was labor intensive to say the least.

  • gregor.us

    You might enjoy seeing this Voice/Slide-Deck presentation of mine which covers coal, but which also covers energy transition and gets to your point: very few modelers put the whole problem together: building out new energy infrastructure, and the time, capital costs, and energy costs involved in such.

    This presentation automatically loads, and plays, in your browser.
    http://smallcapepicenter.com/OnlineConference/G…

    Best,
    G

  • gregor.us

    You might enjoy seeing this Voice/Slide-Deck presentation of mine which covers coal, but which also covers energy transition and gets to your point: very few modelers put the whole problem together: building out new energy infrastructure, and the time, capital costs, and energy costs involved in such.

    This presentation automatically loads, and plays, in your browser.
    http://smallcapepicenter.com/OnlineConference/G…

    Best,
    G