The Restructuring of Global Oil Demand

The global financial crisis may be hastening a process that’s been underway the entire decade: the restructuring of global oil demand. Western OECD oil demand has been much slower the past 15 years and its growth rate started to stall out again as early as 2004. The more spectacular leg of the advance in the price of oil was therefore built in large part on non-OECD demand. Of course. While this looks like a tidy and easy-to-read set of circumstances, however, it’s actually a bit more complicated than merely splitting the world in two.

Now, at the risk of wading into an imperfect or confining analogy, I want readers to recall the leapfrog phenomenon that so aptly characterized the first uptake of mobile phones in the developing world. Instead of building out switching stations and miles of telephone poles, companies built towers–and then sold handsets. Users were then able to get a piece of the miracle of telephony, without having to bear so much of the cost for the old installed base of wires and buildings. Today, this structurally different relationship to airtime is now being replicated in the way a new user of oil comes online, in the developing world.

tata2

What we see therefore is that the way in which oil is still used in western OECD nations tends to recapitulate, each day, the entire history of the oil age. In other words, we are burdened in the West by the legacy of Plenty. Whereas the new user of oil in the world is liberated by the more recent age of oil Scarcity. In the West we carry on amidst the old architecture of superhighways, long commutes, and two car families. We are the rotary telephone users in a new age of oil, lugging around heavy black handsets and losing contact when wires are felled during storms. In the developing world, meanwhile, a single gallon of petrol is a life-changer when poured into any high-mileage vehicle. The developing world is marked by enormous populations in densely packed mega cities. Adding just 50 miles a week of motorized commuting to an individual’s or a family’s lifestyle here is nothing less than transformational.

What’s exciting, and what’s also rather daunting, about this transformation is that I don’t think the world en masse really understands this new line of demarcation. Instead, the intellectual West continues to either navel-gaze about its own vulnerability in this new world of oil scarcity-or- it monolithically projects this predicament when trying to understand the developing world. As a result, the West neither sees its deeply embedded leverage to the price of oil, nor the rest of the world’s emerging ability to take just a piece of oil’s concentrated power. A little oil goes a long way.

So what we are faced with here are two very different topographies, of oil demand. In the West the individual remains very exposed, very leveraged to oil in a kind of vertical structure. Changes in the price of oil, especially above 100 dollars a barrel, exert tremendous pressure on his lifestyle. But in the developing world, the topography of oil use is flatter. The new Tata car, which I only use as a recent example of the kind of organic response Asia has made in motorized transport, will likely get 60 miles to the gallon. Does it really matter if petrol is 4.00 USD or 8.00 USD per gallon, if you have raised your lifestyle enough to commute 4-5 miles a day by car? No, it does not. And therein lies the opportunity for the individual, but a new problem for the world.

The problem is that the developing world is where all the people are. In addition, it’s the topography where all the new oil users are. And in that world, the horse-power and man-power equivalents to a barrel of oil’s 5.8 million BTU are nowhere near to alignment. Here, men are undervalued to the price of oil–in a world where oil remains undervalued. The tipping point has come. What this portion of humanity will prove to the world is that the miracle energy substance known as oil contains so much concentrated power, that they will both be willing and able in the aggregate to take the price of oil to its final destination.

-Gregor

This post is available in .pdf version. Click hereThe Restructuring of Global Oil Demand

  • BryanLong
    I've riffed on this idea a bit in "$15 per Gallon Gasoline" at http://www.econosystemics.com. Thanks for the stimulus, G.
  • llboyd
    excellent post as usual Gregor. nothing to add here.
  • mika.
    I see America as a terminally sick patient. It is culturally politically economically and psychologically bankrupt. I agree with Max Keiser when he says that we've been basically dieting on our own spew for last few decades. It will not be long before the nutritional value of this diet goes to zero, and then less than zero.
  • gregor.us

    ...we've been basically dieting on our own spew for last few decades.


    I'm reminded of what a Vet told me once: " If a dog makes a mistake eating something, it throws it up. If it makes a mistake throwing it up, it eats it again."


    I'm not sure how this fits in to the discussion, but yes--I do remain concerned that the US economy is built on little more than the recycling of wishes and hunger.


    What's also concerning is that presently there is the view that we still have alot of choice and discretion over what we do next. This is why, for example, I have decried on this blog the subordination of the energy problem to the climate change problem. The current national conversation presumes we have lots of time to fix the energy problem--this only 9 months after a terrible price spike that some of the better thinkers, like James Hamilton at UC SD, are fairly certain made the recession much worse. I just don't see how a no-growth economy generates enough capital to build out a new energy architecture. We need growth.


    But I digress.


    Yes, we are indeed in the process in western OECD countries of a switch from liquid fuels to electrified transport. I just wish, of course, the US would go there by choice instead of imagining that goblins control the price of oil.


    G

  • mika.
    "I just wish, of course, the US would go there by choice instead of imagining that goblins control the price of oil."
    ==

    The goblins are in control of everything, Gregor, not just the price of oil.
  • Thank you for relinking from Twitter today as I had missed it before. It is a great piece.

    Have you done the math on developing world moving towards 3 or 5 barrels of oil per person per year times two or three billion people? Do you have a timeframe for anything like that? I don't know the starting point for most of the developing world but the last number I saw on China was 2.2 barrels of oil per person per year, up in just a few years from 1.8. For those of us levered to it, it's scary.
  • gregor.us

    I have indeed started working on the math. There is much work to be done. But if you look at Diesel, or Electricity, or other forms of energy, the gap between Developed and Developing is so enormous that as we close it, what happens is counter-intuitive to people here in the West: We're just not able to shed our large consumption as 300M Americans or 300+M Europeans enough, to account for relentless new use in the Developing world, where 4-5 B reside.


    Scary indeed.


    G

  • D. V
    Avner Mandelman had an interesting article in the Globe and Mail (Canada) this morning about electrical car technology that Buffet is investing in.
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LA...

    There was also a large article about improvements to oil sand extraction technology same edition
  • gregor.us
    There are some indications now that cost-inflation is finally in recess in Alberta, thus lowering the cost for anyone who wants to start a ne mega-project. Problem is, current price of oil has fallen further so far, than inflation. So somehow we need to see oil back above 80/90 but with the current lower construction costs to remain in place.

    Tough math.

    G
  • zebra
    Gregor, your piece makes me think of the example of the marginal utility of a glass of water. To a man in the desert with none, the marginal utility is infinite, while to the rest of us, the marginal utility of another glass of water is very low.

    In the US we are living way down on the marginal utility curve for oil.
  • gregor.us
    Nicely put. Now add to Water the concentrated energy content of Oil--and you can see how the world will find a way to climb the value and price ladder.

    Thankyou.

    G
  • Rob
    Hi Gregor, a very insightful piece. I think this is a critical linkage -- the price of oil vs. human energy/work. I live in Asia and I concur that oil is very undervalued in this regard -- I see it nearly every day. IMO your mobile phone analogy is very appropriate.

    For what it's worth, the only other commentator I have seen link these two items is Chris Martenson (www.chrismartenson.com). I find Chris's analysis on the linkages between economic growth, credit growth and the low price of oil to be very intriguing. You are barking up this very same tree as it relates specifically to the energy markets.
  • gregor.us
    Chris Martenson is great and, as it turns out, lives not far from me here in Western Massachusetts.

    I remain "intrigued" at how inept the US press remains in dealing with all of these issues. It may be the fate of individuals such as yourself to write for the US press, to try and explain the world to readers here.

    There is much more for me to cover, on this topic. There are some big implications here. Finally, there is the unique substance of oil itself--which is now in a wide-band price phase typical of a depleting resource. It was encouraging that Shai Agassi understands that, for example.

    http://gregor.us/oil/shai-agassi-understands-oil/

    G
  • brasil61
    Hi G ..nice article..When mentioning the value of men vs oil I think of Brazil ..as recently as 3 years ago ..I had watched new 10 - 20 story super luxury towers being built by manpower (wheelbarrow)...not a backhoe in sight ..deliveries off loaded on the street ...and lugged up thru manpower only.

    Also in the same vain...the closest thing I have seen to slavery was the sugarcane workers... I had the opportunity to teach in some of those sugarcane villages in the Northeast. I believe the sugarcane success story to be a myth ..built on cheap labor..and un-acceptable environmental issues ..the clearing of the coastal Mata-Atlantica rain forest once the size of Amazon..now less than 10% is left and the burning of the fields to harvest.

    Well thanks ..as always your work and writing is excellent
  • Cliche maybe, considering its recent exposure, but Open Veins of Latin America offers an historical overview (up to the 1950s) of the sugar industry in Northeast Brazil, the labor issues it wrought, the environmental devastation, etc.
  • gregor.us
    When I moved back to the States from London, at the tail end of 1998, I resolved to try and avoid sinking in to a US centric viewpoint. It's not easy.

    But, I am glad to hear you recognize some of the themes here, in Brazil. I've not been to Brazil. Though I have had alot of students (from my teaching days) from Brasil and S.A. I sometimes wonder if every macro-oriented person should find a way to get exposure to young people from around the world. They give you very good information!

    I could not agree more with you on the cheap labor arbitrage wrt to sugar cane. Labor, like corn, will rise in price eventually whenever a biofuel chain gets going. We saw that in corn ethanol. How great it was when Corn was cheap and the ethanol companies were just getting started--and able to turn cheap corn into more expensive "petrol." But once corn moved higher, then the a masked truth about corn ethanol was suddenly revealed--the margins were simply too thin. The energy profit margin in particular was too thin.

    So yes, what happens to Alcool when labor costs finally rise? I grant that the latitude of Brazilian plantlife is ideal. However, I am firm in my overall view on all biofuels everywhere--there's simply no "there" there. The energy-profit margin is thin so when underlying costs rise as they always will--you are dead.

    Good to see you,

    G
  • Bryan
    Wow. Excellent piece, Gregor! Only sentence I'm still trying to figure out is in the last paragraph, "Here, men are..." I'm not sure I get what you are trying to say there. But I get the idea -- they see so much more clearly the true energy value of a liter of gasoline. Probably true of clean water, too.
  • gregor.us
    Thanks Bryan. This piece finally starts to lay out a viewpoint I've held for some time, but have been unable to flesh out in the fullness it deserves.

    I grant that the line you refer to about the value of persons in the developing world is a tad cryptic. Not to put too fine a point on it but the idea I am edging towards there is that wages have been too low for too long in the emerging world, and the tipping point is coming where enough wealth has now built that a portion of the petrol pie can now be afforded. In addition, since this is a trend, I see purchasing power rising, in the developing world. And the intriduction of oil in the more individual lives will create some new efficiencies.

    What I hope for my blog posts is that they are both a record and a platform for me to expand and build later on, even as I want them to be at least mostly complete for the reader.

    Thanks so much for reading.

    G
blog comments powered by Disqus